Prepared for the 1997 Christa McAuliffe Technology Conference
Nashua, New Hampshire -- December 4, 1997
http://www.stg.brown.edu/pub/slides/roger/McAuliffe.html
Let's distinguish some basic forms of collaboration:
Contemporary high-energy physics papers are often interesting examples of this "weak" form of collaboration. There is a division of labor, some sort of agreement about questions to be answered and/or tasks to be carried out, and a willingness to behave as in a contractual relationship.
Sometimes described as cooperation with a common goal, we think of teamwork as involving regular and sustained communication between the "players" in addition to the qualities of cooperation. The Dalton School's Archeotype project shows how classroom teamwork can be motivated naturally, but it is important to remember that teamwork is difficult in an environment of individual rewards.
It is interesting that as we move into the realm of the most creative collaborations, or those ideal but ultimately uncommon instances of collaboration, we increasingly rely on aphorism and metaphor. We also notice the need for sustained interaction, reflection and dialogue in "higher" or "deeper" forms of collaboration.
This quotation, by the musician Joe Zawinul (playfully describing the approach of the jazz group Weather Report), reminds us that the combination of individual and collective excellence is a critical feature of the most profound forms of collaboration.
The Web, as a system of distributed hypermedia, makes possible collaborative curricula as well as collaborative (hyper)texts, and these can themselves include advanced tools, interactive presentations and primary texts.
While projects do not require networked technologies, the connections to authentic data and authentic tasks, as well as authentic community, make for project-based learning that spontaneously promotes autonomy, motivation and of course collaboration.
Even when there are no computers in the classroom, technology allows teachers to communicate as professionals, and have local access to educational materials as never before. These networks of colleagues can help teachers solve problems of course, but they can also stimulate professional development and innovation.
While the idea of linking schools with communities is an old one, the ease of network publishing has demonstrated the tremendous power of community collaborations to create materials of great cultural value.
Recent reports on the "impact" of technology in K-12, whatever their conclusions, may suffer from a species of disengagement characteristic of social sciences with natural science envy. They ignore, for example:
Can we figure out whether the technology is having an impact? Here are some preliminary questions for teachers to ask themselves after teaching with technology:
In order to take full advantage of the sites referred to in this talk, you'll need the following (free) Web plug-ins:
© 1997 Roger Blumberg and the Scholarly Technology Group, Brown University
Back to Roger's Talk Homepage